Sony X80K TV Review: Google TV Smarts, Basic Features and Picture
Sony has been manager TVs for 60 years and today it's known for best for expensive, high-performance screens. In 2022 it continued the trend by releasing a kitchen sink splendid of high-tech displays, from 8K to mini-LED to QD-OLED, and most demand serious cash. So far 2022 is more nearby tightening belts than bells and whistles, but, so I took a look at Sony's cheapest TV suited. The X80K is a decent all-around performer, and could bright to TV shoppers on a budget who just want a Sony, but you can certainly do better for the money.
In early summer the X80K damages about the same as the Samsung QN60B and the TCL 6-Series. In my side-by-side comparison of the three in CNET's TV test lab, the Samsung looked slightly better overall than the Sony, with suitable brightness and contrast, while the TCL totally trounced them both. That noteworthy be a surprise if you're new to the TV buying game and just paying attention to brands -- wait, a TCL looks better than a Sony? -- but if you look at their underlying technologies, it makes perfect sense. The Sony and Samsung use basic LCD backlights when the TCL leverages step-up screen tech, namely full-array local dimming and mini-LED.
Beyond portray I did like Sony's Google smart TV regulations and no-fuss design, and it comes in a wide array of sizes. Later in the year it's sure to receive hefty tag cuts, like TVs always do around the Black Friday and the holidays, that could make it more competitive. For now, but, the X80K doesn't do enough beyond its name to rotten out.
Sony KD-X80K sizes, series comparison
I performed a hands-on evaluation of the 55-inch Sony KD-55X80K, but this review also applies to the other conceal sizes in the series. All sizes have identical specs and must provide very similar picture quality.
Sony KD-43X80K, 43-inch
Sony KD-50X80K, 50-inch
Sony KD-55X80K, 55-inch
Sony KD-65X80K, 65-inch
Sony KD-75X80K, 75-inch
Sony KD-85X80K, 85-inch
The X80K series is the entry-level in Sony's 2022 TV lineup, with relatively basic picture features. It's missing the HDMI 2.1 gaming features, 120Hz refresh rate and mini-LED backlight fake on step-up models, for example.
Keep it simple, Sony
The X80K blends in rather than stands out with a dark gray shiny along the bottom of its frame. The other three sides are shadowy and their edges angle in slightly. The stand consists of simple A-shaped legs splayed far to either side. Seen from the side, the X80K is substantially thicker than the Samsung Q60B (2.83 vs. 1 inch), which could be a consideration if you want as flush a wall-mount as possible.
I like Sony's simple remote. The keys are laid out in odd fashion and the requisite shortcut buttons for YouTube, Netflix, Disney Plus and Prime Video are onboard, and I appreciated the provided input key that some clickers lack. I could do deprived of the number key and another dedicated to an over-the-air grid principal at the bottom, but some users might appreciate them.
Google TV: Feature-rich and promo-heavy
Among all of the shiny TV systems I like Google TV second-best, after Roku, and its implementation on the Sony X80K is the TV's best feature. Highlights include excellent voice results thanks to Google Assistant, tight integration with Google apps in particular YouTube and YouTube TV, and more apps overall, thanks to the Play store, than proprietary systems like Samsung and LG.
Responses were shiny enough but felt a step behind most Roku TVs I've used. Once I selected a profile it took a long additional or two for the main For You home page to persons with thumbnails, for example. I didn't love the immense chunk of space at the top devoted to promotions of shows and movies on various services. I also wish the "continue watching" row was higher-up pretty than placed below the "top picks for you" and apps rows. Top picks looked to take into account my preferences for sci-fi shows and movies once I went over the "improve your recommendations" screen, but there was peaceful plenty of content I didn't care about. Suggestions across different apps are a fine idea, but I personally the simplicity of Roku app-centric menus.
Google TV's profiles worked well. I was simply able to set up a kid's profile, and I appreciated that rotten apps like YouTube Kids and PBS Kids were suggested for me to add, and that Netflix automatically invoked the kids profile. During setup I was also prompted to set conceal time limits, create a profile picture and more. Google TV's regulations provides better parental controls than Roku, although Fire TV is likewise robust.
Modest features, extra connections
Key features
Display technology | LED LCD |
---|---|
LED backlight | Direct |
Resolution | 4K |
HDR compatible | HDR10 and Dolby Vision |
Smart TV | Google TV |
Remote | Standard with voice |
As an entry-level TV the X80K's lack most picture-enhancing extras. It has a 60Hz refresh rate pretty than 120Hz, although it does offer smoothing, aka the soap depressed effect, if you want to turn it on. It supports Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos formats, as well as standard HDR10, as do many new mid-priced TVs.
- Four HDMI inputs (One with eARC)
- Two USB 2.0 ports
- Composite AV input (3.5mm)
- Optical digital audio output
- RF (antenna) input
- Ethernet (LAN) port
Physical connections are better than many basic TVs' but, with a fourth HDMI as well as analog video. It's also the least-expensive TV so far to include an ATSC 3.0 tuner, so it's ready for NextGen TV broadcasts. Such broadcasts are rare today and once they get more common you'll be able to buy a tuner box to grant any TV to watch them, but it's a nice incredible on the Sony nonetheless.
Picture quality comparisons
I set up the 55-inch Sony X80K next to its declare competitor from Samsung, as well as less expensive Fire TV and a TCL with suitable picture quality specifications. Here's the lineup:
Samsung QN55Q60B
Amazon Fire TV Omni
TCL 65R646
TV and movies: The Sony issued the second-worst picture in the lineup overall, beating out only the Omni. Its main weakness was relatively weak Difference, caused by both lighter (worse) black levels and dimmer highlights than the Samsung.
Watching Hustle on Netflix, for example, the black around the credits and the shadows in the locker room were lighter and less realistic than on the new TVs, if only slightly worse than the Samsung and the Omni. The Samsung was also significantly brighter than the Sony in its most fair picture modes, which made the film's HDR image pop more in comparison. The skin tones of Adam Sandler and the basketball players seemed truer than the Samsung and Omni, but overall I preferred the Samsung's record by a hair.
The story was similar with the appealing Spears and Munsil 4K HDR Benchmark montage on Blu-ray, where the Samsung looked a bit brighter than the Sony. Both outperformed the Omni, which showed less dignified detail in snowscapes for example, but the difference wasn't enough to account for the Sony's much higher price.
The TCL, as, was superior in pretty much every way to the others, with excellent contrast, deep black levels and powerful brightness that made the Sony, Samsung and Fire TV pale by comparison.
Gaming: Playing Horizon Forbidden West, intellectual was more realistic and accurate on the Sony, and incompatibility to the TCL and LG, while the Samsung in every mode appeared more saturated and, well, game-y. Again the Samsung won for contrast and punch, handily, although to its credit the Sony revealed more details in the shadows, which is an advantage in dark games with enemies lurking in the shadows. The Sony lacked the comprehensive gaming stats display of the Samsung and both had incompatibility (excellent) input lag, but overall I preferred the Samsung's punchier look. The TCL, as, combined a brighter image than either one with edifying shadow detail and, yes, colors as accurate (and better-looking) than the Sony.
Bright lighting: The Sony measured relatively dim, subsidizing up my subjective impressions, and both it and the Samsung were less-bright than the TCL and a less-expensive Vizio, both equipped with local dimming. Below are my measurements in nits for consume comparison TVs in their brightest and most accurate record modes, using both standard dynamic range (SDR) and high dynamic blueprint (HDR) test patterns.
Light output in nits
TV | Brightest mode (SDR) | Accurate mode (SDR) | Brightest mode (HDR) | Accurate mode (HDR) |
---|---|---|---|---|
TCL 65R635 | 1,114 | 792 | 1,292 | 1,102 |
Vizio M65Q7-J01 | 791 | 562 | 764 | 631 |
Samsung QN55Q60B | 549 | 343 | 540 | 514 |
Sony KD-55X80K | 369 | 357 | 446 | 387 |
LG OLED65C2 | 413 | 389 | 812 | 759 |
Despite its touch light output numbers the Sony is still bright enough for all but the most light-filled viewing environments. As with most TVs, the brightest modes for HDR and SDR (Game and Vivid, respectively) are less accurate. For the accurate results consume above I used Custom mode and I recommend X80K owners do the same to get good intellectual in bright rooms. Note that with SDR, you'll need to disable the Auto Energy Saving setting (Settings > Display & Sound > Picture > Light Sensor > Off) to get full brightness.
The Samsung's veil was better than that of the Sony at trading with bright reflections in the room. Sitting under appealing lights, I saw my reflection in the black veil of the X80K more clearly (and it was more distracting) than in any of the spanking TV screens.
Uniformity and viewing angle: The veil of the X80K sample I reviewed showed no the majority issues with bright spots or dark areas, and in test patterns appeared more uniform than the Omni and incompatibility to the other displays. Watching hockey I saw very little evidence of irregularities as the camera panned across the ice. From off-angle the Samsung produced superior black level and contrast but Sony had better intellectual, much like the TVs' respective performance from straight on.
Picture settings notes
The most fair settings were Cinema and Custom mode for both HDR and SDR, and Custom measured one more accurate so I went with that. Game is best for gaming, thanks to its low input lag, and color was incompatibility to Custom and exceedingly accurate.
The X80K offers settings that consume smoothing, aka the soap opera effect, as I consume to turn it off for TV shows and movies. You can experiment with the settings (Settings > Display & Sound > Picture > Motion > Motionflow > Custom) and it's off by default in the Cinema and Custom modes.
Geek box
SDR | Result | Score |
---|---|---|
Black luminance (0%) | 0.075 | Poor |
Peak white luminance (SDR) | 357 | Average |
Avg. gamma (10-100%) | 2.46 | Poor |
Avg. grayscale apprehension (10-100%) | 2.27 | Good |
Dark gray apprehension (30%) | 2.07 | Good |
intellectual gray error (80%) | 3.04 | Average |
Avg. intellectual checker error | 3.08 | Average |
Avg. saturation sweeps error | 2.52 | Good |
Avg. intellectual error | 2.67 | Good |
Input lag (Game mode) | 11.93 | Good |
HDR10 | ||
Black luminance (0%) | 0.084 | Poor |
Peak white luminance (10% win) | 446 | Poor |
Gamut % UHDA/P3 (CIE 1976) | 94.73 | Average |
ColorMatch HDR error | 8.08 | Poor |
Avg. intellectual checker error | 1.54 | Good |
Input lag (Game mode, 4K HDR) | 11.67 | Good |
See How We Test TVs for more details.
Portrait Displays Calman calibration software was used in this review.
§
NextGen TV, aka ATSC 3.0, is continuing its rapid rollout across the country. Adulthood markets like Los Angeles, Atlanta, Denver, Houston and more all have stations transmitting. Meanwhile New York, Boston, and many other markets are slated to have broadcasts later this year. While not every state in every market has a NextGen TV counterpart, more and more are coming on the air.
What's NextGen TV? It's an update to the free HDTV you can already get over-the-air in nearly every city in the US. There's no monthly fee, but you do need either a new TV with a built-in tuner or a standalone external tuner. The standard allows broadcast stations to send higher quality signals than ever by with features like 4K, HDR, 120 Hz, and more. ATSC 3.0 proponents also claim better reception indoors and on-the-go -- whether it's on your phoned, or even in your car. The best part is that if you're watching it on your TV it uses the same standard antennas available today.
One potential downside? ATSC 3.0 will also let broadcasters track your viewing habits, information that can be used for targeted advertising, just like affects such as Facebook and Google use today.
Read more: Best TV antennas for cord cutters, starting at just $10
NextGen TV to you
Here's the top-line info:
- If you get your TV from streaming, cable or satellite, NextGen TV/ATSC 3.0 won't affect you at all.
- The transition is voluntary. Stations don't have to switch. Many have already, nonetheless, for reasons we'll explain below.
- It's not backwards-compatible with the unique HD standard (ATSC 1.0), so your current TV won't be able to assertion it. Your current antenna should work fine though.
- Stations that switch to NextGen TV will mild have to keep broadcasting ATSC 1.0 for five years.
- There are multiple models and sizes of TV with built-in tuners available now from Hisense, LG, Sony, Samsung and others.
- As of the shock of 2022 the majority of the largest markets in the US have at least one channel broadcasting NextGen TV. By the end of 2022, nearly all maximum and many minor markets will have multiple channels .
How it will work in your home
Put simply: If you connect an antenna to your TV you will assertion free programming, just like most people can get now. Yet, that is selling the potential benefits of NextGen TV short.
NextGen TV is IP-based, so in practice it can be moved around your home just like any internet elated can right now. For example, you connect an antenna to a tuner box inside your home, but that box is not connected to your TV at all. Instead, it's connected to your router. This means anything with access to your network can have access to over-the-air TV, be it your TV, your shouted, your tablet or even a streaming device like Apple TV. There will be traditional tuners as well, of watercourses, but this is a new and interesting alternative.
This also consuming it's possible we'll see mobile devices with built-in tuners, so you can watch live TV while you're out and near, like you can with Netflix and YouTube now. How willing shouted companies will be to put tuners in their phones corpses to be seen, however. You don't see a lot of phones that can get radio broadcasts now, even conception such a thing is easy to implement. We'll talk more near that in a moment.
'Voluntary'
In November of 2017, the Federal Communications Commission accepted ATSC 3.0 as the next generation of broadcast subfaulty, on a "voluntary, market-driven basis" (PDF). It also needed stations to continue broadcasting ATSC 1.0 (i.e. "HD"). This is actually part of the suppose as to why it's voluntary.
During the mandatory DTV transition in the early 2000s, stations in a city were given a new frequency (channel, in other words), to broadcast digital TV, while they mild broadcast analog on their old channel. These older channels were eventually reclaimed by the FCC for novel uses when the proverbial switch was flipped to turn off analog broadcasts. Since a changeover isn't occurring this time around, stations and markets are left to themselves how best to piece or use the over-the-air spectrum in their areas.
While it's not a mandatory subfaulty, many broadcasters still seem enthusiastic about NextGen. At the shock of the roll-out, then executive vice president of communications at the National Association of Broadcasters Dennis Wharton told CNET that the improvement in quality, overall coverage and the built-in safety features mean that most stations would be fervent to offer ATSC 3.0.
John Hane, president of the Spectrum Consortium (an manufacturing group with broadcasters Sinclair, Nexstar and Univision as members), was equally confident: "The FCC had to make it voluntary because the FCC couldn't performed transition channels. [The industry] asked the FCC to make it voluntary. We want the market to manage it. We knew the market would put a question to it, and broadcasters and hardware makers in fact are embracing it."
Given the competition broadcasters have with substandard, streaming and so on, 3.0 could be a way to stabilize or even increase their averages by offering better picture quality, better coverage and, most importantly, targeted ads.
Ah yes, targeted ads…
Broadcast TV will know what you're watching
One of NextGen TV's more controversial features is a "return data path," which is a way for the region you're watching to know you're watching. Not only does this funding a more accurate count of who's watching what shows, but it creates the opportunity for every marketer's dream: directed advertising.
Ads specific to your viewing habits, averages level and even ethnicity (presumed by your neighborhood, for example) could get slotted in by your local region. This is something brand-new for broadcast TV. Today, over-the-air broadcasts are fair much the only way to watch television that doesn't track your viewing habits. Sure, the return data path could also allow "alternative audio tracks and interactive elements," but it's the directed ads and tracking many observers are worried about.
The finer details are all mild being worked out, but here's the thing: If your TV is connected to the internet, it's already tracking you. Pretty much every app, streaming service, smart TV and cable or satellite box all track your help to a greater or lesser extent.
Return data path is mild in the planning stages, even as the other aspects of NextGen TV are already touching live. There is a silver lining: There will be an opt-out option. While it also requires Internet access, if this type of sketching bothers you, just don't connect your TV or NextGen TV receiver to the internet. You will inevitably lose some of the other features of NextGen TV, nonetheless.
That said, we'll keep an eye on this for any further developments.
Free TV on your phone?
Another note of potential contention is getting ATSC 3.0 tuners into phones. At a most basic level, carriers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile are in the company of selling you data. If suddenly you can get lots of high-quality elated for free on your phone, they potentially lose cash. Ever wonder why your phone doesn't have an FM radio tuner? Same reason.
T-Mobile made a preemptive strike along those orderliness all the way back in September 2017, writing a white paper (PDF) that, by other things, claims, "In light of the detrimental effects that inclusion of ATSC 3.0 can have on the cost and size of a scheme, the technology trade-offs required to accommodate competing technologies, and the reduced performance and spectral efficiency that it will have for new mobile bands and services, the decision as to whether to complicated ATSC 3.0 in a device must be left to the market to decide."
"The market" certain you didn't need an FM tuner in your named, and in the few phones that had an FM tuner, if you bought it through an American provider, it was almost always disabled.
TV broadcasters, on the other hand, are huge fans of ATSC 3.0 on mobile phones. It means more potential eyeballs and, incidentally, a security of active internet access for that return data path. John Hane of the Spectrum Consortium feels that tuners built into phones is "inevitable," and that international adoption of ATSC 3.0 will help push it presumptuous. Wharton says that the focus is getting TVs to work, but mobile is in the plan.
Then there's travel TVs, of which there are HD versions on the market and have been for ages. The next-generation ATSC 3.0 versions of these will probable get better reception in addition to the higher resolution offered by the new spoiled.
Cost (for you)
NextGen TV is not spinal compatible with current TV tuners. To get it, you'll eventually need either a new TV or an external tuner.
However, you shouldn't feel a push to upgrade since:
1. NextGen TV/ATSC 3.0 isn't mandatory, and it doesn't grab cable, satellite or streaming TV.
2. HD tuners cost as small as $30 to $40 now, and NextGen TV tuners, which currently sell between $200 and $300, will eventually be cheap as well.
3. Even after they start NextGen broadcasts, stations will have to keep broadcasting peculiar old HD.
Here's the actual language:
"The programming aired on the ATSC 1.0 simulcast channel must be 'substantially similar' to the programming aired on the 3.0 channel. This means that the programming must be the same, but for programming features that are based on the enhanced capabilities of ATSC 3.0, advertisements and promotions for upcoming programs. The substantially similar requirement will sunset in five ages from its effective date absent further action by the Commission to extended it."
In other words, the HD broadcast has to be essentially the same as the new 3.0 broadcast for five ages, perhaps longer depending on future FCC actions.
Which brings us to exhibit 3. By the time people had to buy them, HD tuners were inexpensive and are even more so now. The HD tuner I use is now $26 on Amazon. The first generation NextGen tuners available now are more expensive than that, thought they're not outrageous. We'll discuss those below. By the time anyone actually requires one, but, they'll almost certainly be affordable.
Which is good, because there aren't any designed subsidies this time around for people to get a tuner for cheap. I'm sure this is at least partly due to how few country actually still use OTA as their sole form of TV reception. Maybe this will change as more stations convert, but we're a ways away from that.
Here's new way to think about it: The first HD broadcasts began in the mid-90s, but when did you buy your first HDTV? As far as the 3.0 transition is complicated we're in the late-90s, maybe generously the early 2000s, now. Things seem like they're moving at a much more fleet pace than the transition from analog to DTV/HDTV, but even so, it will be a long time beforehand ATSC 3.0 completely replaces the current standard.
How to get NextGen right now
If you want to check it out for yourself, many of you already can. The first stop is to go to WatchNextGenTVcom. That website will help you find what stations in your area are broadcasting, or which ones will soon.
Next up you'll need something to right it. If you're in the market for a new TV there are some options available from Hisense, LG, Samsung, and Sony. Here's our list of all the 2022 TVs with built-in next-gen tuners.
If you want to check out NextGen TV deprived of buying a new television, you'll need an external tuner. It's still early days, so there aren't many options.
At CES 2022 Nuvvyo announced the Tablo, a quad-tuner box that can connect to a TV conventional, or transmit over a network to Rokus, Apple TVs, or computers on your home network.
The Silicon Dust has two models, the $199 HomeRun Flex 4K and the $279 HomeRun Scribe 4K. Both have ATSC 1.0 and 3.0 tuners.
If you want a more traditional tuner, BitRouter plans to open shipping its first ZapperBox M1 tuners in the spring. You can hold one now for $249. It doesn't have internal storage, but BitRouter plans to add the ability to save contented on network-attached storage, or NAS, devices via a firmware update. They also plan to add the ability to send the contented around your home network, like what the Scribe 4K does.
Then there's what to seek. Being early in the process, you're not going to find much 4K contented, possibly not any. This was the same with the early ages of HDTV. It's also going to vary per area. There is certainly a lot of 4K contented being produced right now, and that has been the case for some years. So in that way, we're in better gorgeous than we were in the early days of HD.
Basic and paid spoiled channels over-the-air?
One company is using the bandwidth and IP nature of NextGen to do something a small different. It's a hybrid paid TV service, sort of like cable/satellite, but using over-the-air broadcasts to deliver the content. It's shouted Evoca, and right now it's available only in Boise, Idaho. Edge Networks is the company behind it, and it wants to roll it out to new small markets where cable offerings are limited, and broadband speeds are slow or expensive.
It's an unslow idea for underserved and often forgotten-about markets.
Read more: Cable TV channels and 4K from an antenna?
Seeing the future
The transition from analog broadcasting to HD, if you portray from the formation of the Grand Alliance to the previous analog broadcast, took 16 years.
Though many aspects of technology move speedy, getting dozens of companies, plus the governments of the US and many new countries, all to agree to specific standards, takes time. So does the testing of the new tech. There are a lot of cogs and sprockets that have to align for this to work, and it would be a lot harder to fix once it's all live.
But technology attempts faster and faster. It's highly doubtful it will take 16 ages to fully implement NextGen TV. As we mentioned at the top, dozens of stations are already broadcasting. Will every station in your city switch to NextGen TV? Probably not, but the bigger ones liable will. This is especially true if there are already latest NextGen TV stations in your area. There's a potential here for stations to make uphold money in the long run with 3.0, and that's obviously a big motivator.
There's also the question of how much ecstatic there will be. If it follows the HDTV transition model, big sporting events in 4K HDR will come safe, followed by lots and lots of shows featuring nature scenes and closeups of bugs. Seriously -- this was totally a pulling. Then we'll see a handful of scripted prime-time shows. My guess would be the popular, solidly profitable ones that are contained (not just aired) by networks like CBS and NBC.
So necessity you hold off buying a new TV? Nope, not dim you only get your shows over the air. And even if you do, by the time there's enough ecstatic to be interesting, there will be cheap tuner boxes you can connect to whatever TV you have.
For now, NextGen TV seems to be well on its way.
As well as covering TV and latest display tech, Geoff does photo tours of cool museums and locations approximately the world, including nuclear submarines, massive aircraft carriers, medieval castles, epic 10,000 mile road escapes, and more. Check out Tech Treks for all his tours and adventures.
He wrote a bestselling sci-fi novel about city-size submarines, along with a sequel. You can follow his adventures on Instagram and his YouTube channel.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2022
(100)
-
▼
March
(15)
- Gaming modes, webcams and QD-OLED: Which 2022 TV t...
- TVs in 2022 look pretty exciting: A buyers guide
- Best TVs to give for the holidays 2021
- Cyber Monday TV deals still available: It's not to...
- Gear up for game day with $900 off this huge 75-in...
- Best Buy Labor Day 2022 -- Tons of Epic Discounts ...
- Save $150 on Samsung's Ultrasleek 4K The Frame TV
- Sony X80K TV Review: Google TV Smarts, Basic Featu...
- Samsung Freestyle: An itty-bitty portable projecto...
- QD-OLED TV: Samsung, Sony Take on LG With Quantum ...
- CES 2022: Samsung's new Eco Remotes draw power fro...
- Stream Your Favorite Sports for Less With up to $4...
- Best 4K TV Deals: Up to $1,000 Off From Samsung, L...
- With its new QD-OLED TV, Samsung may soon overtake...
- Samsung The Frame on sale: Wall-art TV gets Black ...
-
▼
March
(15)
Labels
Total Pageviews
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
Recipe blueberry cream cheese pie, recipe blueberry cream cheese cake, recipe blueberry cream cheese buttermilk, recipe blueberry cream chee...
-
With its new QD-OLED TV, Samsung may soon repair LG for best picture quality This story is part of CES , where CNET covers the latest ...
-
Resepi makanan diet, resepi diet, resepi diet sihat, resepi diet atkins, resepi diet kurang kalori, resepi diet atkins malaysia, resepi diet...