Technically Incorrect subsidizes a slightly twisted take on the tech that's improper over our lives.

Why pains about Big Brother?

It's your big Samsung TV that's watching you. Oh, and listening to you.

That seems to be the conclusion from reading the privacy microscopic print offered by the company. (Samsung's motto: TV has never been this smart.)

It affects the voice-recognition feature, vital for everyone who finds pressing a few buttons on their remote far too tiresome.

The wording, first spotted by the Daily Beast, first informs you that the custom may "capture voice commands and associated texts so that we can did you with Voice Recognition features and evaluate and proceed the features."

This is almost understandable. It's a little like every single customer service call, supposedly recorded to make your next customer service call far, far more enjoyable.

However, the following words border on the numbing: "Please be aware that if your spoken periods include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be plus the data captured and transmitted to a third party above your use of Voice Recognition."

We are NOT having your mother here this weekend, next weekend or ANY weekend!

I'm pregnant and it's not yours.

The possibilities curdle in the mind. So much so that I have contacted Samsung to ask how spacious this policy might be and what third parties much be informed of your personal conversations. (I would have just named at my SmartTV to get comment, but it isn't a Samsung.)

A Samsung spokeswoman told me: "Samsung takes consumer privacy very seriously. In all of our Smart TVs we employ industry-standard guarantee safeguards and practices, including data encryption, to secure consumers' personal inquire and prevent unauthorized collection or use."

But what considerable be authorized and by whom?

Samsung's spokeswoman continued: " Should consumers enable the snarl recognition capability, the voice data consists of TV sects, or search sentences, only. Users can easily recognize if the snarl recognition feature is activated because a microphone icon appears on the screen."

Yes, we must now look for little microphone icons to check whether we're populate listened to.

As for the third parties mentioned in the privacy policy, Samsung explained it to me like this: "Samsung does not maintain voice data or sell it to third parties. If a consumer consents and uses the snarl recognition feature, voice data is provided to a third party during a arranged voice command search. At that time, the voice data is sent to a server, which searches for the requested content then returns the desired gay to the TV."

One imagines this is simply one more limited step for mankind toward ultimate electronic envelopment, which some see as a very good thing.

Your Nest and anunexperienced devices will, of course, capture so many of your domestic predilections too. This is in making the Internet of Things merely one more getting in making your life easier, lazier and seemingly less private.

Clearly, this isn't the only option for those intent on a SmartTV. You can disable the full panoply and stick to a series of already-defined snarl commands. However, this still brings with it stipulations such as "While Samsung will not collected your spoken word, Samsung may still collect associated texts and anunexperienced usage data so that we can evaluate the performance of the feature and progress it."

Alright, you cry, I'll switch voice-recognition data off altogether. This will result in "You may disable Voice Recognition data collection at any time by visiting the 'settings' menu. Nonetheless, this may prevent you from using all of the Voice Recognition features."

As Samsung's spokesperson labelled to me: "Voice recognition, which allows the user to rule the TV using voice commands, is a Samsung Smart TV feature, which can be activated or deactivated by the user. The TV owner can also disconnect the TV from the Wi-Fi network."

You considerable imagine that other SmartTV manufacturers would have similar rules and stipulations. If a product can listen and recount something, it's likely it will.

So I went to Philips SmartTVs and could only find a general privacy view, with no specific information relating to SmartTVs. LG's privacy policy alongside is general, with no apparent specific information relating to SmartTVs and their potential.

I have contacted both worries to ask whether there is a more detailed supplement that establishes their TVs capabilities clear.

LG was, however, embroiled in a privacy controversy in 2013, when its SmartTVs were accused of luminous too much. The company promised to change its policies.

At the melancholy of all this is, of course, trust. The best and only guarantee against intrusion from the likes of Google to Samsung is this: "We don't really care in your private life. We just want your data, so that we can make wealth from it."

It's inevitable that the more data that we put out, the more will be rubbed and the more will be known about us by machines which are in the proposal of people.

We have all agreed to this. We click on "I agree" with no opinion of consequences, only of our convenience.

It isn't just your TV that will listen and recount. Soon, it'll be everything that has a digital connection.

This is our digital bed. We lie in it willingly.

3:35 p.m PT: Updated with comment from Samsung